Some people think that the best way to reduce the time spent in travelling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city center with apartment buildings for commuters, but others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Nowadays, many people have to travel a long distance to their workplace. Some who find it uncomfortable propose to remove parks and gardens surrounding the city center and build apartment buildings for employees instead; however, there are also some opponents of that idea. In this essay, I will attempt to justify both viewpoints as well as provide my perspective that totally supports the former.
On the one hand, the construction of new apartments helps people feel comfortable in terms of the traffic congestion. Firstly, when people have to travel a long distance to work, they may use means of transportations such as cars and motorcycles. This phenomenon may lead to traffic congestion that may deter the workers from getting to their workplace on time.However, if those people can live near their workplace, they tend to cycle or just walk to work that might reduce the transaction of large numbers of vehicles.
On the other hand, some city dwellers want to retain the gardens and parks because those are the places that bring amusement to them. Moreover, many trees and flowers in the parks, gardens might make the city more attractive and help to absorb carbon dioxide and produce oxygen. That is to say, it may help to maintain the moderate temperature in the city. What is more, gardens and parks can be ideal places when people long for a refreshing breeze after a strenuous day of work.
All in all, the replacement of the gardens and parks are essential for us to build more apartments. Although both practices bring about certain advantages, turning green spaces into buildings for workers is certainly more beneficial.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 332, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...will attempt to justify both viewpoints as well as provide my perspective that totally sup...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 361, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...from getting to their workplace on time.However, if those people can live near their wo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, such as, as well as, what is more, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01831501832 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72619032239 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.141034704 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.166666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261177285008 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863390105081 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05948379249 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149753345233 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382547041819 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.