Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many people believe that reading books is more beneficial for children compared to watching TV or engaging in computer games. Personally, I contend that the former and the latter have equal positive aspects for children.
On the one hand, it is undoubtedly that books would offer considerate benefits to children to some extends. Firstly, Books are instrumental in enhancing children's imagination and development. For example, a child reading a fairy tale with illustration will have to think, fantasize, and use their creativeness to comprehend the ideas and reasoning, which in turn sharpens their mental skills. Secondly, Reading a book that is not written in mother tongue could develop a strong language base. It means that children can gain new vocabularies and comprehend the meanings of a word in different contexts.
On the other hand, Watching TV and playing games are considered an important activity in children's development. To begin with, watching TV play a vital role in boosting linguistic competence. It can be explained by the fact that many recent English shows support the audience to remember new words easily by associating them with vivid images shown on the screen. Moreover, children can enhance their multitasking skills by playing games. For instance, they might have to move their joystick around, while looking at various elements on the screen and make split-moment decisions that are vital to winning.
In conclusion, while the benefits of reading are undeniable, they can not outweigh the role of watching TV and participating in games in enhancing a person's skills and language.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Many people believe that reading books i...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30859375 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91291815249 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58984375 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2284894192 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.538461538 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26742705779 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977782976073 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826252042368 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169289035436 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679223080607 0.056905535591 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.