Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often advocated that reading from a book is preferable to watching TV or playing video games on a computer for children. Personally, I vehemently agree that watching TV and playing computer games are not as good as reading stories from a book.
One point in favor of reading stories by books is that reading stories from a book stimulates imagination and creativity. Admittedly, in order to assist readers to understand the characters, stories, and settings in stories, many of them include drawings. Furthermore, the only effective approach for youngsters to increase their literacy is via reading, which is crucial if they want to have a career that pays well in the future. To illustrate, reading has helped my brother broaden her horizons and develop useful skills in learning and life. Hence, it can be beneficial to increase a child's reading proficiency/capacity via tales in order to increase their prospects of future employment success.
One of the main objections to watching TV and playing computer games is that they cause health risks spending too much time sitting in front of the screen. Children who become couch potatoes through spending too much time in front of the TV or computer screen are prone to obesity, which carries health risks such as diabetes or heart disease. For instance, my brother used to spend most of his spare time playing games and watching TV lead to the fact that he has a chance of getting obese. Moreover, those activities are a waste of time and they make children separate themselves from society. Therefore, watching TV or playing computer games is not healthy.
To reiterate, I once again reaffirm my position that watching TV or playing video games than wasting time reading stories from a book.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01023890785 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78868204446 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525597269625 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6030125755 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.923076923 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387414890513 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163198161997 0.084324248473 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14288848022 0.0667982634062 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282689510943 0.151304729494 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141738899189 0.056905535591 249% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.