Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree

Some arguments claimed that Reading books can be more beneficial than watching movies or playing computer games for young child. This notion is a tendency that has remained a source of controversy. In my opinion, I firmly agree with these debations and I will outline my reasons in this essay below.
To begin with, Having a fact that the acquisition of knowledge is the key to better career prospects in today's knowledge-based society. So on, Reading book is also a part of those. Reading with teenagers are more deserved because of its merits. There has a variety of books about diverse fields and it provides us a huge amount of knowledge about those ones. Books can be instrumental in enhancing children's imagination and development. For example, If giving for children with a fairy tale, it would stimulate the deeper insight in their brain and comprehend well-rounded plot of one story, thereby, It will be stepping stone to benefits later as well as practical skills, awareness progress would be boosted.
another reason is worth considering into that Reading books helps improve language skills. Spending time reading a book that is not written in mother tongue leads to the development of an another strong language base on the thought-provoking and cognitive instinction. To be specific, When any children is seen a book that is not their available language, they will feel confused and frustrated. For a long time parents instruct them and spend much time more and more in researching gray matter and the language of story, they are more attractive and help us comprehend the value and impact of new language through reading books.
In conclusion, I firmly believe with some arguments that reading book is very worthwhile and have been superior to watching TV or playing virtual games by these aforementioned ideas above.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Some arguments claimed that Reading book...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...utline my reasons in this essay below. To begin with, Having a fact that the ac...
^^^^
Line 2, column 351, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'those' instead.
Suggestion: those
...des us a huge amount of knowledge about those ones. Books can be instrumental in enhancing...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 604, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...well-rounded plot of one story, thereby, It will be stepping stone to benefits la...
^^
Line 2, column 650, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ill be stepping stone to benefits later as well as practical skills, awareness pro...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... awareness progress would be boosted. another reason is worth considering into...
^^^^
Line 3, column 5, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Another
...reness progress would be boosted. another reason is worth considering into that R...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'a strong' or 'another strong'.
Suggestion: a strong; another strong
...ther tongue leads to the development of an another strong language base on the thought-provoking ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of new language through reading books. In conclusion, I firmly believe with som...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05940594059 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84675992795 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597359735974 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4927222599 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235483353464 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776698005755 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789859190796 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155325719118 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585538139348 0.056905535591 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Some arguments claimed that Reading book...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...utline my reasons in this essay below. To begin with, Having a fact that the ac...
^^^^
Line 2, column 351, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'those' instead.
Suggestion: those
...des us a huge amount of knowledge about those ones. Books can be instrumental in enhancing...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 604, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...well-rounded plot of one story, thereby, It will be stepping stone to benefits la...
^^
Line 2, column 650, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ill be stepping stone to benefits later as well as practical skills, awareness pro...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... awareness progress would be boosted. another reason is worth considering into...
^^^^
Line 3, column 5, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Another
...reness progress would be boosted. another reason is worth considering into that R...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'a strong' or 'another strong'.
Suggestion: a strong; another strong
...ther tongue leads to the development of an another strong language base on the thought-provoking ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of new language through reading books. In conclusion, I firmly believe with som...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05940594059 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84675992795 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597359735974 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4927222599 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235483353464 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776698005755 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789859190796 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155325719118 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585538139348 0.056905535591 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.