Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion?

It is true that the question of whether to spend time for taking up and preparing the food science or essential subjects remains a source of controversy in education field. While a number of people believe that school time should be allocated for food science, I would argue that it is imperative to spend time on important subjects.
On the one hand, a section of individuals thinks that food science can benefit pupils for some reasons. First, since this subject teaches them to analyze food constituents, as well as understanding the chemistry of food components, such as protein, carbohydrates ,.. they will better manage their diet. For instance, a diabetic person can learn to avoid food with high sugar content and get nutrients from other products. The second benefit is that it provides students with hands-on experience instead of just theories. For example, they can apply knowledge to calculate the calories in their daily meals which leads to a healthy and independent lifestyle.
On the other hand, apart from food science, a wide range of natural science, social science and language subjects pave the way for students to acquire comprehensive skills and preparation. As a matter of fact, school curriculum has been modified and designed cautiously by experts in order to reach the ultimate educational efficiency, repudiating the whole suspection of its ability. Furthermore, the modern world imposes stricter qualities for a global citizen, which means one getting access to several areas may take advantages over others. Moreover, in the case of his indifference to food science, he can earn his stable income thanks to other streams of study rather than food science program.
In conclusion, although food science is undoubtedly significant at school, time management should be kept in order to balance with other subjects, as a person of success must be prepared for manifold real-life cases and challenges from all areas, not only food science.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
It is true that the question of whether to spend time for taking up and prepari...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 263, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...mponents, such as protein, carbohydrates ,.. they will better manage their diet. F...
^^
Line 2, column 265, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...onents, such as protein, carbohydrates ,.. they will better manage their diet. For...
^^
Line 2, column 268, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...nts, such as protein, carbohydrates ,.. they will better manage their diet. For inst...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, so, well, while, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, as well as, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23417721519 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80674145049 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623417721519 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9387116586 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.230769231 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.5384615385 7.06120827912 206% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265446068602 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843231026066 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724142464221 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166755596263 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515683100411 0.056905535591 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.