The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea. What are the reasons and solutions?
There is no doubt that wildlife habitats are being destroyed and that whole species of animals are on the verge of disappearance due to human activities on land and in the sea. This essay will outline a number of reasons for this trend and a number of possible solutions to help tackle the issue.
There are two main reasons why humans are slowly making many species disappear, never to be seen again. Firstly, one of the easiest to notice is deforestation. Deforestation can be seen in any country where people are living today, and it’s one of the most common ways to make an entire species extinct. Due to most land animals common habitat being the forest or jungle, a forest fire or cutting down trees is basically destroying their home. Adding to the first reason, which is also some of the most popular reasons why animals are going extinct, is that thanks to overhunting and catching creatures in the wild, whether it’s in the wild or in the ocean, this can lead to potential special breeds of animals getting erased because of the low population, and they could be overlapped by another type of animal. For example, fish catching is starting to get out of hand in certain countries, causing some really rare fish to be on the verge of being eradicated from the earth.
There is no doubt that wildlife habitats are being destroyed and that whole species of animals are on the verge of disappearance due to human activities on land and in the sea. This essay will outline a number of reasons for this trend and a number of possible solutions to help tackle the issue.
There are two core reasons behind the disappearance of natural species. Firstly, trees are cut down to meet the demand for space for more industrial factories and farmlands. This leads to the loss of non-artificial habitats that animals need for their lives and activities. Secondly, hunting rises in popularity, causing more people to go hunt down the fauna in the wild. This not only has a devastating impact on biodiversity, but it also makes the already rare animals even more scarce.
Some solutions can be implemented to handle this alarming situation. Firstly, people have the ability to create campaigns for planting trees to cover the amount of trees being chopped down daily. It is extremely viable, as anyone can lend a hand and work this out together. Secondly, the government should impose strict regulations for hunting. It can be as simple as limiting the areas allowed for hunting or as in-depth as a lesson on endangered animal hunting consequences.
In conclusion, natural habitat losses and illegal wildlife hunting and trafficking are the two main drivers of animal extinction. To address this issue, governments must protect and restore natural ecosystems, and everyone should join hands to stop the illegal trade of endangered species.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, really, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 13.1623246493 228% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2366.0 1615.20841683 146% => OK
No of words: 482.0 315.596192385 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90871369295 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64674352497 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46265560166 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 742.5 506.74238477 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0498949737 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.545454545 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.40909090909 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233311852953 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699319939427 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951693552261 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146776838641 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118002505309 0.056905535591 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, really, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 13.1623246493 228% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2366.0 1615.20841683 146% => OK
No of words: 482.0 315.596192385 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90871369295 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64674352497 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46265560166 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 742.5 506.74238477 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0498949737 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.545454545 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.40909090909 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233311852953 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699319939427 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951693552261 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146776838641 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118002505309 0.056905535591 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.