It is argued that human beings should only be responsible for protecting animals that benefit mankind, rather than endangered ones. From my perspective, I strongly disagree with this statement because all animals play a crucial role in the natural ecosystem.
To begin with, the extinction of a species can cause a disruption in the environment’s food chain. This happens because animals help sustain a reasonable balance among species. On the contrary, the disappearance of an animal can give rise to the rapidly growing or dropping numbers of other animals, which might offer pessimistic effects on people. Take the sparrow as an example. The extinction of this bird in many parts of China resulted in an outrageously abundant number of crickets, posing significant damage to crops in general and causing a widespread famine. This outcome killed hundreds of millions of Chinese people.
In addition, the pace of global warming has contributed to the disappearance of numerous species. Climate change can result from a wide variety of human-induced activities over a long period of time. It is true that the popularity of deforestation and illegal hunting has driven multiple wild animals into extinction. This extinction is a transparent indication of a relentlessly exacerbated environment. Individuals will most likely suffer irreversible effects if the environment remains greatly exploited and undermined. The main objective of people is to preserve the environment, which means the protection of all species.
In conclusion, I reaffirm that mankind should protect all animals from extinction because their existence sustains ecological diversity and a natural balance among species. Moreover, protecting all animals implies protecting nature and even humans.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...of human-induced activities over a long period of time. It is true that the popularity of defo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, in addition, in conclusion, in general, it is true, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60820895522 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12967627397 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634328358209 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5119099001 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9375 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23246060815 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668032870471 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588952428602 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146932889824 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487001529065 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.