Some people claim that resources should be allocated to improving a healthier lifestyle rather than treating patients. From my perspective, I strongly disagree with the statement because both spendings are equally significant.
On the one hand, keeping healthy is considered a healthy lifestyle in modern days thanks to several benefits it brings to individuals and society. It is common these days that the increased number of exercise equipment and sports yard has been installed by authorities in an effort to encourage their citizens to work out routinely to keep fit. The Vietnamese government, for example, has spent tremendous amounts of state budgets installing outdoor facilities and services at affordable prices, pushing locals to engage in enhancing both physical and mental wellbeing. Therefore, promoting a healthier lifestyle may prevent human beings from some metabolic diseases like obesity.
On the other hand, people who suffer from illness should be focused by governments. Many people have already suffered from intrinsic diseases since they were born, which are restrictions preventing them from socialising with other people in society. This would be harmful if authorities ignored the existence of these people. Thanks to scientific and technological progress in the last few years, the increased number of advanced treatment methods has been applied successfully, and thus, encouraging the patients to get rid of their former negative emotions and connect to the world. Therefore, governments should pay more attention to promote higher living standards for their citizens who are either disabled or normal, leading to a healthy society where no one is ignored.
In conclusion, I believe that resources spent enhancing a healthy lifestyle and curing patients are of paramount importance in equal measures.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... The Vietnamese government, for example, has spent tremendous amounts of state bu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62093862816 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89934628235 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646209386282 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8079348473 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.75 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222258945818 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717986971868 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496485543954 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120843645138 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407826816417 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.