It is argued that the ultimate solution to spur children to have a healthy diet is at school, while some people believe that caregivers are better. This essay will state both sides of the argument before my preference is presented.
On the one hand, proponents of the former support school for some reasons. The first one is that teachers are loaded with a solid understanding of specializing knowledge and can confidently express the information with the most efficient teaching approach. As a result, their students are more likely to be convinced to follow a healthier diet. Moreover, communications of a healthy diet between students can stimulate them to pursue this diet as long as possible. For instance, if one student benefits from a healthy diet, his peers are more persuaded, which keeps them refusing cancellation of such diet.
On the other hand, I believe that with deliberate education of a healthy diet by parents, children are more interested in eating such diet. Despite watching numerous videos on clean eating uploaded on the Internet, youngsters, especially children, are less likely to do the same instructions and have a healthy diet permanently. This is because they have trouble doing this without their caregivers’s support. Therefore, parents play an important role in their childrens’s orientation of the diet. In other words, the teaching of a healthy diet by parents can be better at educating their children about the importance of having a healthy diet completely suitable for each person.
In conclusion, I reaffirm that albeit teachers have a full grasp of a healthy diet, the educating of the clean eating habit by parents is more beneficial for encouraging children.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19565217391 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94001144501 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550724637681 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9348607292 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.307692308 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406708269511 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147240616211 0.084324248473 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111176439248 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255857286879 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670327381342 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.