Given the fact that traditional businesses tend to establish enclosed stations in which workers are separated from employers, while several modern offices are designed with open space meaning there is no barrier amid co-workers. In my opinion, working in an open space offers workers creativity and better conversation among them.
To begin with, a growing number of companies have been switching old cubicles to spacious design due to its efficient results on workflow. Nowadays, a great number of graduates are not confident enough to show their abilities and desire to stay focused on doing private things in their spare time rather than having a meeting with their co-workers. As a result, most of them find struck in communication and teamwork which leads to the downfall in the whole result's company.
As there is no visible barrier, co-workers will have more face-to-face interactions related to work and afterward the workflow might run effectively and smoothly thanks to approachable space. A well-known software corporation called Google has been applying the open design since its establishment, which helps its workers easier in exchanging information and taking a deep breath during work.
In conclusion, I reaffirm that open design offers an effective environment in the workplace because the workers find it more convenient in exchanging ideas and information revolving around the work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 458, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'results'' or 'result's'?
Suggestion: results'; result's
...hich leads to the downfall in the whole results company. As there is no visible barri...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 218.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45412844037 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90287247922 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.665137614679 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.9547363512 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.625 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23328155024 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911602849094 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402620306417 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130232597496 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265715421608 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.