There has been a debate whether children in a modern society should be taught history whose events had occurred in the past. From my preference, studying history is of paramount importance in personal and career success. Besides, several drawbacks can arise from those children who have never entered history classes.
On the one hand, history plays an important role in the development of individuals and the country. This happens because having a solid understanding of the country’s history can give them multi-dimensional perspectives towards similar events that can take place in the future, and gratefulness of their ancestors who had fought for the country’s deliberation and reunification, which can provide them with a massive stimulation for promoting themselves and the country. For example, most Vietnamese civilians these days appreciate their ancestors' patriotism and diligence by putting enormous efforts into striving for themselves and the country thanks to the history courses they had entered.
On the other hand, children who have little knowledge of their country can pose potential threats to society. First, they can be convinced to engage in activities like a protest against the country by the hostile rival foreign nations, resulting in growing unrest and increased crime rates. Not being loaded with a consistent awareness of the country’s history, students might have trouble distinguishing between authorized information and distorted one by reactionaries who desire to fracture the current regime. Moreover, due to the advent of social media platforms like Facebook, the exposure to false and segregation statements by the reactionaries without meticulously selecting reliable bloggers or sources would be increased. This is because children lack a comprehensive awareness of the country’s history.
In conclusion, I believe children should be taught the history of their country because history plays a significant element in the growth of every nation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67558528428 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07406803706 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598662207358 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.201224676 49.4020404114 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.416666667 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14017943279 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05972812296 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405202885291 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101677125579 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511583683373 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.