It is believed that a successful businessman is expected to be excellent at math. From my perspective, I am not completely convinced with this view to some extent.
On the one hand, math plays an important role in one’s life. Before making any drastic actions, a business would do throughout calculations to avoid situations that might lead to the company facing bankruptcy. Doing math in future investments allows businesses to predict upcoming situations they can encounter, hence making instant adjustments to not only reach their targets but also avoid failures. One of the largest companies globally, Samsung, had done multiple careful calculations before allocating billions of dollars to the establishment of mega factories in Vietnam. Thanks to the initial measurements, these factories allows Samsung to gain roughly 74 billion dollars in 2020.
On the other hand, I still believe that individual characteristics make a greater contribution to a success of a business. One of the good virtues is the capability to take risks. Take Elon Musk as an example. He has been known as an ambitious person who bravely steps out of his comfort zone and takes risks. As a result, one of his companies, Tesla, has been considered a pioneer in electric vehicles and has successfully sold millions of electric cars globally. Additionally, leadership should be taken into consideration. Numerous startups across the globe are facing unsettlement due to poor management, contributing to wrong decisions.
In conclusion, I reaffirm that despite the irreplaceable position of math in every business, personal characteristics are far more critical, considering their benefits to successful entrepreneurs.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, still, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48854961832 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27329632844 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68320610687 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.1723252623 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4666666667 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130445037089 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386368626179 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421615176299 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0669208893521 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419961081162 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.