In some offices, employees work in enclosed workstations or cubicles. Other offices have a more open design, in which there are no walls separating employees from their coworkers. Which type of arrangement do you think is most effective? Explain, giving reasons to support your answer.
It is true that working area pays a vital role to the workers, especially the one working in an office. I believe that different office designs like using the traditional partitions, or modern open area, could make different effect in terms of enthusiasm, productivity and loyalty to workers.
On the one hand, I believe that the workers might find more safety, stablity and privacy when working in a traditional partitioned area. Moreover, they trend to more concentrate on their work when they stayed in an area surrounded by something. For example, as I remembered when I had worked at a large company before, I never interrupted or distracted by others, I can easily work hard on my own work stayed in my own enclosed area, even there were many staff working at the same time.
On the other hand, many workers feel that working in modern open area could easy the communication between their own teammates or even different teams. It is undeniable that workers might have more contacts after taking off the barriers which encourage workers share and voice out their ideas softly. Furthermore, with the advantage of open area, workers more likely to establish relationship among each other. For instance, when I was worked in a small company before, the office was not large enough to make any separation. Everyone can hear everyone's talking, it feels like a small family worked together.
In conclusion, while modern open design have many good points, the advantages of traditional partition design should not be ignored.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...different effect in terms of enthusiasm, productivity and loyalty to workers. O...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0157480315 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70606220282 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566929133858 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9108243101 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.818181818 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4545454545 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170813159588 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677590799611 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0219780317213 0.0667982634062 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104488105352 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238545033741 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.