Thanks to technological advances, a number of scientists and tourists in modern society can travel to remote areas effortlessly. While this trend is beneficial to some extent, I would argue that its disadvantages are more significant.
On the one hand, the primary benefit arising from scientists travel to isolated natural places is that they can do numerous positive research relating to environmental impacts, which can serve as crucial data for implementing protective schemes in the future. Due to global warming, water levels have been rising gradually, which can contribute to the disappearance of some major cities located near the coast in the future. Therefore, carefully researching these upcoming drawbacks in remote areas provides governments with a profound observation about climate changes in an effort to enact laws that protect the environment.
On the other hand, I believe detrimental effects this development induces must be highlighted. Firstly, the appearance of tourists in remote areas can contribute to natural devastation to build facilities serving them, posing negative threats to nature and the wild animals. Moreover, industrialization in these areas can result in devastating accidents affecting animals on a larger scale. For example, an oil spill by the incident of an oil vessel on the departure to the Antarctic can lead to the deaths of thousands of ocean creatures and the degradation of coral reefs. As a result, this development poses a series of potential threats to animals and nature.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that despite the aforementioned benefit, this development offers more demerits than merits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48046875 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14712625843 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62890625 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3552667808 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.545454545 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4545454545 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1897024039 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640668467846 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694136730488 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105755858617 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738854264256 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.88 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.