Some people claim that preschool-age children should attend childcare centres due to the best services they offer, while parents assume family members will do better in taking care of their children. This essay will state both sides of the argument before my preference is presented.
On the one hand, childcare centres are suitable for preschool-age children thanks to some benefits below. Firstly, personnel working in these places have years of fieldwork and expertise taught logically and scientifically in training institutions. Therefore, they can provide children with the best selections according to personal personality and strength. Secondly, childcare centres are loaded with a series of both intellectual activities that may trigger children’s creativity and engagement. As a result, their inborn talents can be uncovered naturally and voluntarily, which is crucial in personal and career success when they grow up.
On the other hand, I believe grandparents can become better carers because of several reasons. The first one is having tremendous amounts of spare time. This can be explained by the fact that they might have been retired from their former workplace due to unqualified standards of physical and mental abilities. Thus, abundant hours can be spent on their grandchildren without being distracted by any work-related business. Secondly, as a childcare staff might have to look after many kids simultaneously, some may not get enough attention. This problem will rarely happen if they are watched by their grandparents because grandparents frequently look after one child.
In conclusion, although some amenities childcare centres induce, I am of the opinion that grandparents can offer their grandchildren undivided attention.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 30, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'amenities'' or 'amenity's'?
Suggestion: amenities'; amenity's
...e child. In conclusion, although some amenities childcare centres induce, I am of the o...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66287878788 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03066049028 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628787878788 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.363973185 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.785714286 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301924480869 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091297238 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724872049709 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178947523019 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539985665204 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.