Scientists and tourists can travel to remote natural environments such as the South Pole. Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages?.
Nowadays, more and more people like to explore faraway natural environments. Many humanists think these activities will cause some crises to local organisms, such as destroying their habitat, effect on the food chain, and overexploitation's issue, etc. Some politicians believe this exploration assists human to find other resources of the land. In this essay, I will discuss the pros and cons of traveling to remote natural places, and conclude with my personal opinions.
Firstly, many citizens and official people believe these natural territories possess many physical resources; for example, fossil fuel and rare species. These natural conditions can assist human to overcome many issues, such as improving the price of fuel and studying medicines for rare diseases. Moreover, developing these places can improve the tourism of these countries. Take Iceland as an example, this place attracts many urban folks, because it has much beautiful scenery; for instance, the polar lights and the natural lagoon.
However, some moralists think people and governments should avoid developing these lands because it will result in many bad phenomena. Over-development will damage the natural habitats and cause many rare creatures to face the problem of extinction. Furthermore, the government is hard to prevent tourists destroying these places. Take the South Pole as an example, many visitors like to over there in order to see whales; however, such activity must crush natural environment. This process will lead to the situation of the earth get worse.
To conclude, I disagree the international institution lets people and scientists explore these places. Experts can utilize other methods for medical research; furthermore, citizens can choose other methods to observe this rare environment, such as VR technique. Ultimately, I much prefer to protect and preserve these precious natural resources.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 13.1623246493 8% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63194444444 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83210757799 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8532638357 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.375 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14962154662 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491654003253 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341279178491 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936937878732 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0112215049114 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.