Nowadays, many people argue about the investment of creature's conservation. Many politicians indicate the government and the international institution spend too much money on the protection and cultivation of wild organisms. However, some animal's specialists believe human must spend budgets on these activities because it is related to many aspects, such as the food chain and the diversity of organisms. In this essay, I will discuss both these views, and conclude with my personal opinions.
Firstly, most official people think the government should use the budget of protecting animals for the other purposes since they believe modern people have many issues which are more important than the creatures of conservation. Moreover, this investment cannot help people enhance their quality of life. Therefore, if the official agency or the global institution utilized that money for improving the environment, it might be the most useful cost of solving the earth's problems.
In contrast, some educators and experts trust this expenditure is essential because of it may affect the earth's eco-system. Take an organism as an example, the sea turtles can balance the acid of the ocean, because their major food is algae. If the sea turtles were extinction, it would result in the massive of algae in the sea. While this phenomenon will decrease the oxygen in the ocean, which leads to other ocean's creatures die. Thus, specialists believe the global agency should invest more money in this issue.
To conclude, I strongly agree that this issue should be noticed since the effect of the ecological circulation will finally impact ourselves. Furthermore, conserving animals also have many benefits; for instance, the significance of education, maintaining the diversity of biology and reducing the food chain's problems. Ultimately, I believe the advantages of these protecting creatures' policies outweigh the disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nhance their quality of life. Therefore, if the official agency or the global ins...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52364864865 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8804058809 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9886899367 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188601914263 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581294636813 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498308653971 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11183308509 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061844654321 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.