Are celebrities being treated unfairly by the media? Give your own opinion.
It is evident that the nature of media has rapidly evolved over the past few years,reshaping the way media companies do business. Although invasion into celebrities' privacy has been acknowledged since they entered the showbiz, the media and public have to spare some space for stars' life.
Keeping one's privacy confidential is one of basic human rights even when celebrities' is of the case. First, like ordinary people, famous ones also have their own secrets that they do not want to share and insist more privacy; however, the media does not let them do that. For example, many newspapers updated sensitive news about a singer' personal lovelife, which puts her relationaship in jeoperdy. Second, there are tons of exaggerated information on the media, which causes harm to stars' career. Even if the stars sue those spreading rumours, hardly can they regain their lost reputation, which means that media is treating celebrities unfairly by intervening too deeply in their solitude.
Moreover, intruded by public and journalists, famous people are likely to suffer from mental disorder and physical damage. In fact, it is not rare celebrities have to visit psychologists, take drugs or even committed suicide because their private lives are exposed to everyone, especially dishonorable rumours. Not only that, when it comes to idols' scandals, some anti-fans and paparazzis tend to injure those stars just to get more details on shock news, which is regarded unfair toward public figures.
In conclusion, famous people are treated unfairly by the press since it is getting increasingly harder for them to protect their privacy from being judged by the outside world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , reshaping
... rapidly evolved over the past few years,reshaping the way media companies do business. Al...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ave to spare some space for stars life. Keeping ones privacy confidential is one...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 9, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...me space for stars life. Keeping ones privacy confidential is one of basic hu...
^^^^
Line 2, column 486, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'star'.
Suggestion: star
...tion on the media, which causes harm to stars career. Even if the stars sue those spr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25093632959 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68374470786 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647940074906 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4827181533 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.454545455 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189417592357 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639546264304 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463818150625 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110754672718 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388163870731 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.