Around the world, many animal species become extinct. Some people believe that countries and individuals must try to solve this problem. Others believe that concentrating on problems of human is more important than those concerning species. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is true that people have various opinions about solving the problems of animal extinction. Why a number of people argue that it is not as crucial as focusing on dealing with what we are problematic with, I support the view that both authorities and citizens should collaborate to save animals and resolve the mentioned problem.
There are a number of reasons why we should concentrate on solving human’s problems instead of that of animals. First, these days our society has to face a tremendous number of problems which have significant bearing on humans’ lives. For example, some common issues nowadays are the war between Russia and Ukraine, the proliferation of hazardous diseases like Covid-19 pandemic or malaria, and they are posing a threat to us. Besides, it is true that people have limited budgets that do not allow them to tackle all problems in the world. Therefore, a range of people believe that most of humans’ expenditure ought to go on resolving issues that directly influence the existence of humans.
However, I would argue that protecting animals from dying out is more pivotal. It is obvious that the extinction of a host of wild species is associated with the impacts of humans. We do not have any moral rights to damage them and we should be responsible for these activities. People have cut down many forests to make way for the construction of residential or agricultural areas, decimated them for food or commercial exchanges or forced them to work for hours to satisfy humans’ needs for many years which beget the deterioration in these species’ wild lives and the disappearance of many wildlife species. For example, illegal poaching in Asian nations owing to personal profit has made Asian tigers die out in the past. In Vietnam, elephants living in mountainous areas are harnessed to entertain the tourists, and this makes them become exhausted and die. Therefore, it is essential for both governments and individuals to collaborate and lend a helping hand to preserve the natural habitats of these animals. Furthermore, the more species disappear, the more genetic diversity loses. It is remarkable that the existence of human is closely connected to biodiversity. Consequently, it is reasonable for us to gain a deeper insight into the importance of preserving animals and launching more campaigns to do wonders for wildlife species.
In conclusion, it seems to me that preserving animals ought to be given priority and authorities and dwellers should cooperate with the others to bring a better living condition for them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 582, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the humans') or simply say ''most humans''.
Suggestion: most of the humans; most humans
...erefore, a range of people believe that most of humans’ expenditure ought to go on resolving i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2153.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 421.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11401425178 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88422671044 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534441805226 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7514463646 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.611111111 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3888888889 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234056182069 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706066538986 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446346881072 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127673959401 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538931120767 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.