Many people enjoy watching live events or shows broadcasted on TV, while others would prefer observing the same events in real time in person. While I agree that participate in a live show or event is exhilarating and interesting, I believe that watch the same versions recorded on TV would be more pleasing.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why many people enjoy attending a live event. Because the ambience in the auditorium is extremely stimulating, people might experience the amusement and the excitement, which is not provided by watching TV. Therefore, attendees might be entertained and free from the tension and anxiety. Additionally, people would have a great number of opportunities to improve their social skills. By attending live events, people could meet new people, and therefore they can make friends or they can interact with strangers such as asking them to take a photograph. Thus, take part in a real-time show is amusing.
On the other hand, I believe watching live events on TV would be more enjoyable. Firstly, buying a ticket for a live show is exorbitant while watching the same show is affordable. For example, a ticket for Tomorrowland Global Journey is approximately two thousand dollars. Meanwhile, people can watch it in real time on Youtube for free. In addition, people do not have to worry about being harmed. Staying in a crowded place could be dangerous and jeopardize lives. For example, players from Major League Baseball have done some damages to the spectators, luckily no one is deceased. Thus, watch live shows on TV is not a bad choice afterwards.
In conclusion, liking and disliking vary between people. While many people enjoy taking part in real-time shows, I would be more delighted to watch them on TV.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 634, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'afterward'?
Suggestion: afterward
...ch live shows on TV is not a bad choice afterwards. In conclusion, liking and disliking v...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00680272109 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78964653982 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544217687075 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8763420086 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7777777778 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224617086054 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754158127166 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747223403613 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151437410987 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748307050297 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.