The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000, 2005 and 2010.
The bar chart depicts the rate of youth in tertiary education in three separate years 2000, 2005, and 2010. As a general statement, the figure for country D led the way in all given years. Moreover, the portion of young individuals who set foot in the university of every nation increased after 10 years, except for country B.
Starting at roughly 35% in 2000, the higher education percentage of A was slightly lower than that of D, which was more than 40%. After 5 years, the figure for A rose to nearly 50%, while D's figure stood at exactly a half. At the end of the period, the percentage of young university students of A and D both grew by approximately 10%.
Shifting the focus to the remaining countries, the figure for B stagnated at about 40% after a decade. Nevertheless, the tertiary education rate of C experienced an increment of less than 5% from 2000 to 2005, followed by stability during the second half of the course.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-01-19 | OliviaLH | 56 | view |
2020-07-22 | ngoctham4344 | 56 | view |
2020-07-22 | ngoctham4344 | 56 | view |
2020-07-22 | ngoctham4344 | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart depicts the rate of youth ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fter 10 years, except for country B. Starting at roughly 35% in 2000, the hig...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd D both grew by approximately 10%. Shifting the focus to the remaining coun...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, nevertheless, second, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 1.0 24.0651302605 4% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 773.0 1615.20841683 48% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 168.0 315.596192385 53% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60119047619 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 4.20363070211 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67652699757 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 176.041082164 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613095238095 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 506.74238477 45% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6755598771 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.625 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23370961674 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941741073561 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108204643808 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144710411129 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431259353077 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 78.4519038076 41% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.