The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000, 2005 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram illustrate the proportion of the youth in higher education in 2000,2005 and 2010.
Overall, an increase trend of people accessing to higher education can be seen in all countries, with the exception of country B. In addition, going into higher education among young people in country D was more popular than those in others.
In 2000, the rate of people accessing to universities is 50% and this number increased roughly 2% in 2005 then 52% was also the rate in 2010. The increase trend was also registered in country A and country D that started with 38% and 60% then climbed through years and reach 58% and 80% in 2010, respectively. Different from three other countries, country B registered an downtoward trend in the first five-year of the survey time, which was 40% in 2000 and about 38% in 2005, however there was a recovery of the percentage of young people participating in higher education and finally this rate of country B was 40% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-22 | ngoctham4344 | 56 | view |
| 2020-07-22 | ngoctham4344 | 56 | view |
| 2020-07-22 | ngoctham4344 | 56 | view |
- Throughout history male leaders always lead us to violence and conflict If a society is governed by female leaders it will be more peaceful To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 56
- Are famous people treated unfairly by the media Should they be given more privacy or is the price of their fame an invastion into their private life 78
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'illustrates'.
Suggestion: illustrates
The diagram illustrate the proportion of the youth in higher e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...education can be seen in all countries, with the exception of country B. In addition, going into high...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...e other countries, country B registered an downtoward trend in the first five-year...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, so, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 1615.20841683 50% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 168.0 315.596192385 53% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79761904762 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 4.20363070211 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6786243381 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 176.041082164 51% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529761904762 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 223.2 506.74238477 44% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 16.0721442886 37% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.3522702822 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200350420102 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122223180347 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620121918699 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170617613022 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420635966884 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 78.4519038076 34% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.