The best way to help developing countries is to give them financial aid. Write an essay either agreeing or disagreeing with this statement. Suggest alternatives to this policy?
There is no denying that globalization has exerted an enormous impact on the world especially many developing countries. Some people argue that with the aim of helping these nations keep pace with the fast pace of development of the world, international along with developed ones should give them financial aid. Nevertheless, I wholeheartedly believe this statement is awfully wrongheaded.
First and foremost, providing fiscal aid to these countries is likely to make them become enslave to others. They will find it impossible to deal with their own problems without external help as well as incapable of finding an efficacious way to stimulate the socio-economic development. As a result, when financial provision is used up, in all likelihood, there will be an economic crisis in Third World countries, which have a long lasting influence on individuals’ living standard.
Furthermore, budgeting aid can be squandered on awfully wrong purpose such as nuclear weapons. Not only does this situation have negative effect on human beings’ health but it can also lead to a serious deterioration in relations among countries. This may drive our planet on the verge of being destroyed after millions of years. For example, thanks to huge financial support from China, North Korea has become nation with the most immediate nuclear weapons in the world without taking a full advantage of it with a view to boosting the national economy accompanied by the educational systems.
Last but not least, it is crucial to find a more productive way to help these nations develop without let or hindrance. In my point of view, upgrading educational system is the most prerequisite criteria for a rapid development of every country. Leading professors and experts from all over the world will make it possible for citizens to gain deep understanding about their disciplinary knowledge along with get access to modern technology. This will definitely ensure a more well-qualified source of employees, complement the working productivity and help them flexibly adapt to unpredictable changes in this world.
To sum up, I am totally against the idea of supplying developing countries with financial aid.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, third, well, for example, such as, as a result, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35734870317 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1030010959 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628242074928 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9998290595 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.933333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1333333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278206174498 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878179482512 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565214367246 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161298052672 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570491302466 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.