The best way to reduce pollution is to increase the price of fuel. Do you agree or disagree. What are other solutions can be to reduce pollution.
The superlative method to mitigate pollutant factors in the atmosphere is to soar the charges of gasoline. I am agree with the statement. I shall enunciate my points along with some other probable measures that can be taken to diminish pollution, which will be discussed below.
The preliminary supportive point of my view is alleviation in count of automobiles. No qualm to say with the escalation of cost of petroleum, the marginalised group would start declining the operation of private transport mediums. As a repercussion of which, the number of vehicles, which run on the roads will reduce the level of poisonous fumes. Apart from it, the employment of non-renewable resources such as coal, petroleum, which emit the toxic materials such as carbon monoxide, lead would plunge. Owing to which, the filthy material in the ambience would fade away.
However; this issue can be resolved down by other strategies such as, CNG based automobiles should be utilized. If these modes would be used by populace for travelling to any destination, then categorically, the pollution produced per capita would be quite low. Not only this way could be lucrative for mitigation of this perilous hazard, but also the prohibition on plastic substances should be enacted. Needless to say that plastic does not get degraded in the surroundings by itself, so its prevention can be extremely expedient for nature.
To conclude, i would assert that the increased charges if fuel can alleviate the pollution at some extent but there are also some other solutions such as CNG based automobiles and enactment of law against the usage of products made of plastics
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...s to soar the charges of gasoline. I am agree with the statement. I shall enunciate m...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...l in the ambience would fade away. However; this issue can be resolved down by oth...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 14, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...xpedient for nature. To conclude, i would assert that the increased charges...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, apart from, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16356877323 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91227819255 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624535315985 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0146699451 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.846153846 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200882097874 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598060150311 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496070326393 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115216406509 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051919564573 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.