Some opinions believe that the best way to alleviate growing crime in youth generation is to support their parents with more parental skills. While it is clear that parents play an indispensable role in bringing up their children to be good citizens, I think that parental skills are not enough to mitigate youth crime.
Parents who are fitted with parental skills can instruct their children better and reduce youth criminals. Firstly, parents who are educated to have a good social conscience can raise their children’s awareness of distinguishing legal and illegal activities. It is clear that family plays an important role in shaping a child’s personalities, and therefore, if father and mother always respect each other, this makes a mirror for their children to avoid violent crimes. Secondly, parental involvement would enable children to eliminate bad social relationships, in which young people can turn to crime. Mutual understanding and respecting for children are essential to help young generation get a sense of convenience as they are taught about right moral values from their parents rather than immersing in serious relationships.
Nevertheless, governments should still impose many other approaches to address youth crimes apart from parental skills. From the perspective of legislation, juvenile offenders should be tough on their crimes and even served the prison sentence so that the laws can acts as a deterrent to more severe crimes. Furthermore, although a policy of zero tolerance is necessary, governments should give youth criminals a chance to rehabilitation and if they have good behaviours during the period of punishments. Consequently, while they can feel the full weight of the law through strict punishments, they still can make an effort to get chances to make a fresh start after being released back into society.
In conclusion, although I partially agree that communities would be better if parents are fitted with parental abilities, I think it is better if governments impose many strict punishments on young offenders to against them not to commit illegal activities again.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...criminals a chance to rehabilitation and if they have good behaviours during the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, apart from, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40361445783 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96372685587 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566265060241 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.746430646 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.5 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8333333333 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295461652964 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126798367339 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105629181343 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195492703559 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111543334742 0.056905535591 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.