The best way to solve environmental problems would be for the current generation to accept a similar way of life for the sake of the next generation to what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is indubitable that the detrimental effect of environment problems has been proliferating exponentially in this technologised era. Some people believe that the precotional steps that had been taken currently for solwing the environmental problems are enough for future generation while others oppose this phenomenon. However, I support the letter view and totally disagree with the notion of using similar techniques for future.
There are some multiple reasons behind why it becomes necessary to change the current lifestyle of people to save the environment for future. Firstly, today as population increases it leads to increases deforestation for the resident purpose of people. It would create inescapable circumstances for the next generation to live peacefully. Therefore current generation ought to plant more trees for their next generation. For example, in India, almost half of the people aware about the environmental problems and planted more trees for following generation that could help to reduce the rate of respiratory disorder for the people.
Moreover, in current Era the use of private vehicle is claimed up dramatically that is the most significant reason for climate change. Thus, the current generation should use more public transport that help to keep environment clean. For instance, in USA majority of people has started carpooling that decreased traffic congestion and also reduce air pollution as a result they could help the next generation to live pollution free life.
Last but not least, the government should encourage people to use more solar panels and also developed the proper method for biomedical waste degregation that helps more to decrease environmental problem for future. Hence, These all above steps still needed for today's generation to survive and for the sake of the next generation.
To conclude, it is clear that, in some countries some colossal stapes already taken to reduce environmental problems. However, I believe that these steps are not enough and still required for current people to take some advanced steps for their kids future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d why it becomes necessary to change the current lifestyle of people to save the ...
^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'increase'.
Suggestion: increase
...day as population increases it leads to increases deforestation for the resident purpose ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ident purpose of people. It would create inescapable circumstances for the next g...
^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...the next generation to live peacefully. Therefore current generation ought to plant more ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on should use more public transport that help to keep environment clean. For inst...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49230769231 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87587146555 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535384615385 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8604972232 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324608701491 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124894729644 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681056862963 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193376065811 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620612671689 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.