The best way to solve the world's environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is thought by a group of people that whether increasing the price for fuels of cars and other vehicles or not using clean sources of energy is one of the best ways to solve the world's environmental problem. Personally, although I agree with this idea, I believe that raising the cost of fuels has never been a completely good idea.
The main reason that I am in favour of supporting this idea is that growing the cost of using nonrenewable energy and taxing private car owners more in order to make them less willing to use their car and decreases the likelihood of a person buying their own car. In this way, it somehow creates a trend of using community transportation instead. Take a developed country for example, Singapore. This country has equipped this solution into society for decades, and the result is the awareness of protecting the environment in most of their people's minds.
Nevertheless, I also think that this could make the country’s government less income to develop other aspects of the economy. As usual, protecting the environment is always one of the most costly projects for the government to spend on. This leads to a problem that brings a lot of criticism: the tax. Taxes in some countries these days are quite heavy for its population to deal with. Many workers quit their jobs because their salaries have been taxed by up to 50%, making the number of unemployed non-stop moving up.
In conclusion, while I believe that this way could refresh the environment effectively, I think that the disadvantages of this could completely outweigh any other upside. In my own opinion, the government should do some more alternative ways to make our nature green again.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 521, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umber of unemployed non-stop moving up. In conclusion, while I believe that this...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, nevertheless, so, while, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8724137931 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7249256827 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58275862069 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.634329842 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.692307692 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227052733432 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775291488966 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101246381412 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155111093269 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131541157913 0.056905535591 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.