The best way to solve world’s environmental problems is increasing the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree?
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 7.5pt; font-size: medium; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); white-space: normal; text-align: justify; line-height: 19.8pt;"><span style="font-size: 13pt; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">People differ greatly in their views about the measurement to address environment-related problems. While acquiescing in the idea that raising the price of fuel may combat some environmental issues, I would contend that this policy is far from the best remedy to mitigate the deterioration of the environment in general.<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 7.5pt; font-size: medium; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); white-space: normal; line-height: 19.8pt;"><span style="font-size: 13pt; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">On the one hand, there are two compelling reasons as to why I concede that increasing fuel cost is one way to tackle some environmental degradation problems. First and foremost, making the price of fuel more expensive may curtail the air pollution. This is because this activity can discourage people from the use of private vehicles which can lead to diminishing the amount of traffic fumes polluting the air. Furthermore, selling fuel at higher price may solve the problems of global warming. To explain, both individuals and businesses tend to minimize fuel consumption when fuel cost rises, therefore curb the considerable amount of greenhouse gases, which can be conducive to a decrease in the overall temperature of the atmosphere.<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 7.5pt; font-size: medium; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); white-space: normal; line-height: 19.8pt;"><span style="font-size: 13pt; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">I would, on the other hand, firmly convince that the aforementioned measure must not be considered a holistic approach to address environmental problems. The primary reason is that raising fuel price has little effect on other d environment-related problems. To be specific, higher fuel cost cannot stop overfishing, overhunting, and deforestation from happening. In addition, the environmental degradation problems can be alleviated by taking better actions. An illustration of this is that if mass producing domestics and industrial equipment use environmentally-friendly technology, including solar cells or electronic motor engines, carbon emissions may be reduced.<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 7.5pt; font-size: medium; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); white-space: normal; line-height: 19.8pt;"><span style="font-size: 13pt; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">To sum up, although acknowledging the global warming can be solved by increasing the price of fuel, I would argue that this is not the best way to tackle the environmental degradation issues because it is not a comprehensive resolution and there have been other more effective solutions to ameliorate the deterioration of the environment.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-28 | truognchinh | 84 | view |
| 2018-11-28 | truognchinh | 56 | view |
| 2018-11-28 | truognchinh | 56 | view |
| 2018-11-28 | truognchinh | 78 | view |
| 2018-03-23 | trituong42 | 56 | view |
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 78
- Some students prefer to take a gap year and between high school university to work or to travel Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 91
- The best way to solve world’s environmental problems is increasing the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 78
- Some people think that personal happiness is directly related to economic success. Other argue that happiness depends on other factors. Discuss both sides and give your opinion? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
^^^^^^^Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: 0cm
Line 1, column 707, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: 0cm
... ^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1761, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: 0cm
... ^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 2747, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: 0cm
... ^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, while, as to, in addition, in general, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2896.0 1615.20841683 179% => OK
No of words: 424.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 6.83018867925 5.12529762239 133% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 7.4244264096 2.80592935109 265% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490566037736 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 781.2 506.74238477 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 20.2975951904 207% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 299.114359401 49.4020404114 605% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 289.6 106.682146367 271% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 42.4 20.7667163134 204% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 11.1 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1960682421 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949366118944 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578383209504 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1960682421 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 31.9 13.0946893788 244% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 11.93 50.2224549098 24% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 7.44779559118 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.0 11.3001002004 195% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 23.22 12.4159519038 187% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 33.0 9.78957915832 337% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.1190380762 186% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 10.7795591182 204% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.