The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that the most effective solution to environmental pollution around the world is to lift the price of fuels. I can only partly agree with this view.
On the one hand, raising the cost of fuels would have a direct impact on the demand of consumers and industries. From a consumer perspective, when the price tag of fuel is less affordable, the motive to drive and use fuel-powered engines in households would be weakened, thus reducing the overall demand for fossil fuel. This would be beneficial for the environment since fuel is the major pollutant that leads to carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere. The same pattern of behavior would likely be seen in most industries where companies would race to replace fuel by cheaper types of energy to control the cost of production and profits. On the other hand, such a global issue as environmental degradation cannot be successfully dealt with by adjustment to fuel prices alone. Tougher policies should be introduced to limit the amount of CO2 released into the air. This can be done both by imposing CO2 quotas on industries and by punishing those breaking the laws severely. Besides, environment protection campaigns should be encouraged and given proper publicity to heighten the awareness of the issue. If one comprehends the seriousness of the environmental contamination, he or she will be more likely to engage in efforts of preservation.
In conclusion, raising the cost of fuel may yield positive results in fuel consumption and therefore the environment; however, more action needs to be taken to prevent the planet from being contaminated and destroyed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y to engage in efforts of preservation. In conclusion, raising the cost of fuel ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09328358209 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96833693677 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59328358209 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7931741988 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143541788425 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540934097257 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381355516433 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109990265999 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00759798509104 0.056905535591 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.