The best way to teach children to cooperate is through team sports at school, to what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people hold the view that nothing is better than team sports to instruct cooperation to students. While I agree it will have some significant advantages to demonstrate collaboration to children, I believe that there are other approaches that are as good as playing in a team sport. In this essay, I will indicate some reasons and state my view.
On the one hand, being a member of a team can show students the meaning of cooperation. They built up this skill by trying to achieve common goals together. Taking football as an example, each player takes a different role in a match to make the team become champion, such as: defender, goalkeeper,...Secondly, play in group is an efficient way for children to practise to get along well with peers. While kids interact with their teammates, their social skills can be improved more. The team is not only a competition but also a small community where children can learn how to react to various situations.
On the other hand, teachers usually apply some strategies to cultivate the ability to work in groups of students, which have the same benefits as team sport. To begin learning based on projects, it is used in many subjects, making it one of the most popular teaching methods. For instance, in Geography, students will choose a topic of continents and research about it. They realise the importance of sharing workload so that the project can be presented with high quality in the limited time. Another issue is that there are some students who are not good at or interested in sport. Team sports may not be the perfect way for them to participate in.
In conclusion, considering all of the above points, it is clear to see that children can develop their working skill by joining a team of sports. Nevertheless, there are other approaches from the educators that also help students to become supportive and well-behaved in groups.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 297, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
... champion, such as: defender, goalkeeper,...Secondly, play in group is an efficien...
^^
Line 2, column 301, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Secondly
...mpion, such as: defender, goalkeeper,...Secondly, play in group is an efficient way for ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 28, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...icipate in. In conclusion, considering all of the above points, it is clear to see that c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86111111111 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85285876885 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586419753086 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.313427791 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4375 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169804155305 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052524932825 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494118934816 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993930211192 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374680154169 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.