Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction.Do you agree or disagree?Provide relevant examples if necessary.
It is often argued that it is more advantageous to choose a job with high wage even if it does not appeal to you at all. I completely disagree with this oponion and think that job satisfaction is much more important than salary.
First of all, I believe that job satisfaction gives people a sense of fulfilment that no money can gurantee. Even if someone is earning a high salary, but feels tensed and compromises with his conscience, this person will not enjoy his life. While pursuing one's interests will always bring pleasure and feeling of satisfaction. For example, a lot of famour researchers made their career choices not because of appealing wages, bit because they were passionate about science. That's why it is more important to choose the kind of work that makes you happy than to look only at high salary.
Secondly, doing what you like keeps you motivated and therefore leads to a career growth. In other words, there is a strong relation between job satisfaction and productivity. People who love their jobs can easily excel in their fields of work and achieve better results than those, who put salary on the first place. For instance, Henry Miller decided to leave his everyday job despite a good wage and returned to become a writer. And after enduring years of ups and downs he became one of the famous and well-paid authors of the 20th century. Thus, advantages of jobs that keeps you satisfied outweigh the drawbacks of a love salary in a long term perspective.
To conclude, I strongly believe that job satisfaction is more beneficial than high salary because it makes people happy and motivated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...will not enjoy his life. While pursuing ones interests will always bring pleasure an...
^^^^
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...use they were passionate about science. Thats why it is more important to choose the ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, kind of, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83154121864 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62229433694 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.7487414544 49.4020404114 38% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.2857142857 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245175746215 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815657880495 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720508763852 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160324077161 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054780657288 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.