It is argued that the large amount of money is poured into fauna species and their habitat protection by the authorities and people. Some people believe that this should be a priority spent on other primary problems such as poverty and health care. In this essay, I will give my own perspective.
On the one hand, some people are of the opinion that governments should allocate a budget to solve basic social issues rather than preserve animals and their surroundings. Poverty reduction is becoming a priority issue of many countries in the world. In fact, poverty is also a fundamental cause of social evils such as gambling or theft, which has negative consequences and impacts on security. If the country is safe, the lives of its residents will be guaranteed. In addition, health is the precious capital of each person and the whole society. By upgrading the public health services, the state can reduce the morbidity rate as well as contribute to improving the quality of human forces which is beneficial for socio-economic development.
On the other hand, I am inclined to believe that the authorities should also invest money to conserve fauna and flora species because of its benefits. Firstly, some animals provide various materials to the pharmaceutical industry which help cure many serious diseases. For example, the protein extracted from the Giant Fire-bellied Toad can prevent the tumor from spreading and make cancer from a deadly ailment into a chronic one. Furthermore, creatures also play an important role to maintain the ecosystem coupled with the food chain. With the disappearance of specific animals, other species are significantly affected because they cannot have enough prey for surviving. As a result, the ecosystem gradually became unbalanced due to the extinction of a series of animal species.
In conclusion, people possess different opinions about whether the state should spend money on preserving animals and their habitats or this should be a priority invested to solve the root social issues. However, I strongly believe that both two problems need to be considered on an equal basis.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssay, I will give my own perspective. On the one hand, some people are of the ...
^^^
Line 3, column 746, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eficial for socio-economic development. On the other hand, I am inclined to beli...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nction of a series of animal species. In conclusion, people possess different ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20348837209 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79580443604 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7382797224 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.294117647 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2352941176 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64705882353 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232394171921 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631968701991 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056314531732 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149979534174 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737884581301 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.