It is clear that there has been a greatly increased in personal car possession bover the period of last three decades. As a result today with lot of population travelling in car, the cities has bacame traffic congestion as compared in the past. This essay will discuss elements related to the problem of traffic jam and show some basic solution to them.
Firstly, while determining the cause of this problem, it is noticed that most people prefer to use own car than public transport. Fairly large proportion of leaders think that the government should extend to take public transport more approachable by enlarging the means of transport. For example, subways and metro services. Why people prefer to purchase own cars? For instance, in modern country this system has already served as efficient and cheap means of transport for public for public. As a consequence of this reduce the traffic jam along the city.
Secondly, government should commence a new law or tax of reducing the blockage. It is the best approach to prefer to use public transport. For example, if one person who use own car has to pay huge amount of tax for this daily travel, thus, using public transport is beneficial for riders, especially pedestrians. Because lots of accidents are caused by negligent with traffic rules by drivers. These all would decrease a number of cars of using ownership and resolve the traffic congestion.
To sum up, increasing a car ownership is problematic for big cities. Mentioned above opinions could resolve the current problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'for public'.
Suggestion: for public
... efficient and cheap means of transport for public for public. As a consequence of this reduce the tr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ans of transport for public for public. As a consequence of this reduce the traffi...
^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ial for riders, especially pedestrians. Because lots of accidents are caused by neglige...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03515625 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65236100878 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6015625 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1794250054 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5625 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221304033465 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751341850642 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511044384888 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139136199371 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169159132668 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.