Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now 'one big traffic jam'.
How true do you think this statement is? What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars?
In recent years, it has been increasingly common to see the number of cars have increased significantly during a-thirty years period that leads to the traffic jam appearing in the urban cities. Therefore, the government should have some advances on these issues during the environment being affected by the pollution. From my perspective, I strongly agree with this statement that the government desperately needs to eliminate the number of cars, which is affecting the livelihood of residents.
To begin with, cars play an integral role in the daily routine of citizens, which satisfies the demand to work and travel on the road as a convenient transport. As the price is decreased during the past few years, the residents are more accessible to this transport without considering the cost of the cars. Whereas the production cost has been reduced by the technology progresses during the increase of automatic cars and electric cars to reduce the massive exhaust emissions in order to the conservation of the environment. Moreover, public transports can not cover all the cities, which remains a limitation with the citizens. As a consequence, people are more prefer to own themselves a private transport by the comfortable and convenient rather than the public transport. For example, Tesla has a performance in 2020 with the type of cars using electricity, which is affordable with the finance of residents in the United States, which use to eliminate the gas exhaustion, which put an enormous impact on the ozone layer
In addition, the government should have to encourage the societies to reduce the number of private transport, while this leads to the deterioration of environmental quality as the environment is alarmingly contaminated. To prevent the overload of landfills, the government should have to expand the areas of the public transport system in order to travel around the sites. As the use of public transport is increasing, the residents would get the risk of the traffic jam during the rush hour, especially in the cities, which contain a reasonable price for the underprivileged and reduce the travel time.
To sum up, there is no doubt that the growth of cars has a lot of impacts on the life of people, however, this can be solved by the use of alternative ways of transportation
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 138, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'convenient transport'.
Suggestion: convenient transport
...emand to work and travel on the road as a convenient transport. As the price is decreased during the p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 690, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'private transport'.
Suggestion: private transport
...eople are more prefer to own themselves a private transport by the comfortable and convenient rathe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 942, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...f residents in the United States, which use to eliminate the gas exhaustion, which ...
^^^
Line 2, column 1026, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut an enormous impact on the ozone layer In addition, the government should have ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, in addition, no doubt, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1929.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08970976253 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99877563355 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503957783641 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.0785680364 49.4020404114 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.75 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5833333333 20.7667163134 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162161957714 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626118367784 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418210345682 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106439889643 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348793143877 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.