Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now “one big traffic jam”.
How true do you think this statement is?
What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.
With the implementation of technology, the world is developing faster with a variety of technological advances that have made our lives easier. Over the past three decades, the possession of cars has unutterably witnessed a significant rise which has consequently led to traffic congestion on roads. I firmly think that this statement is very true. The government should take necessary solutions to discourage people from using their cars.
Over the years, the rate of car ownership has accelerated significantly, if not controlled, it is likely to rise further. To begin with, governments all over the world have made an effort to resolve this problem by widening existing roads; however, they have not been able to control the pace of increasing owner cars. Consequently, traffic accidents have been escalating to such a level in metropolitans. Facts have shown that a great number of those who are injured from road collisions and have the arguments in traffic congestion are increasing annually. Therefore, not only does it have an impact on business activities but it also affects the physical and mental well-being of residents. The economy may incur a loss because of the delay in moving their commodities and manpower. Additionally, urban citizens have also suffered from noise and air pollution caused by traffic jams.
There are various measures that governments can determine to contain the issue of rising in the number of cars on roads. Firstly, car agencies are allowed to increase the financial burden of owning a car by imposing taxes on private vehicles by the governments. Moreover, it is the governments’ responsibility to take preventive solutions and encourage people to use public transports to preserve the environment. By organizing several campaigns, the governments might bring about a shift by launching car automation, which considerably decreases traffic congestion and pollution.
In conclusion, although almost all cities are struggling with the high level of traffic congestion, authorities can alleviate this situation by imposing gas taxes on private vehicles and ameliorating public transports manufacture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iorating public transports manufacture.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49848942598 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15386729392 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586102719033 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5247325523 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273573673363 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862122162272 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558280287884 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159836904493 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698994725642 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.