The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminum cans.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
Given is the diagram representing the process by which aluminum cans are recycled.
Overall, it is noticeable that there are six stages in its recycling, beginning with cans being used and culminating in reused cans.
To begin, people throw away consumed cans into the garbage, and then the garbage truck arrives in many places to collect used cans and other types of rubbish. Following this step, they begin to transport them to the factory, and these cans are cleaned, sorted, shredded, and compressed by advanced machines. After that, the metal cans are heated at a high temperature to allow aluminum to melt. It is then rolled out thick flat from 2.5 mm to 6 mm. The aluminum cans are now ready to be recycled into new kinds of stuff, such as drink containers.
In the subsequent stage, these new cans are delivered to factories that make soft drinks and they have to be filled. The cans are now possibly sold to the public and reused. In the UK, 74% of all aluminum cans that are sold are widely consumed and reused.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nds of stuff, such as drink containers. In the subsequent stage, these new cans ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67403314917 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39728079731 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613259668508 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6047684575 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.7 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158237712295 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683812753388 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049828717217 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105617621658 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549703903514 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.