Cars are causing problem nowadays. However, use of bicycle has decreased. Why use of bicycle is decreasing and how can we enhance use of bicycle?
Over the last few decades, human life has become comfortable with the arrival of many technological things, wherein car is the most important facet of it. However, more comforts have brought several eccentric problems in people, and thus they prefer less bicycle. Therefore, as per need of statement, I am going to highlight causes and measures.
To begin with, cycling considers as an essential part of daily exercise for humans whereby they keep themselves fit and healthy. Notwithstanding, use of bicycle has declined on account of manifold reasons. Firstly, people prefer to use car because they associate it with their social status, and it makes them more oblivious related to health issues which may come due to cars. Secondly, people, today, have a sedentary lifestyle wherein they do not like to do any work which requires physical power as a result they use cars for their comforts. For instance, It has been found in many surveys that people have many problems such as backbone pain, obesity and so on.
However, every problem has solution which is similar in this case. The use of cars can be mitigated by manifold initiatives. Very first, government should build separate cycling tracks so that people can easily use it. Furthermore, elite group of society should come forward to promote use of bicycle and cut usage of cars so that other people could also be feel motivated to use bicycle. Secondly, there should be some advertisements to make people aware about importance of health such that they should use more bicycle which in turn will bring healthy body along with reduction in traffic congestion.
In conclusion, it is an unequivocal that less use of car will not only bring better life but also helps in reducing pollution.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03135888502 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60592238989 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613240418118 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6501875666 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286083202892 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103117918223 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863833001512 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156248653339 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884487201657 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.