The line graph illustrates the number of tourists and local people who travel in the UK and overseas respectively, during 1979 to 1999 and the bar chart describes the majority of the UK citizens who visited internationally tour in the famous 5 countries across the years. Overall, it can depict that the portion of the UK residents had the most significant number in million during travelling aboard. Whereas, the lowest number in million had visited by UK general, people in the Turkey.
To begin with, In 1979, the figure of general people of the UK stood with 13 million and slightly increased in 1984 up to 20 million. Subsequently, this trend shown dramatically rose across a decade up to 55 million. What is remarkable is the tourists who visited the UK shown gradually risen up to 28 million in 1999, whereas on the other side, mostly UK residents visited in the France up to 12 million, which is the almost half of overseas travelers in the corresponding year.
Furthermore, It is worth to mention that the portion of UK residents had also visited Turkey, Greece, USA and Spain, where it’s accounted for 2, 3, 4 and 8 million respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ents had the most significant number in million during travelling aboard. Whereas, the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 432, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...g aboard. Whereas, the lowest number in million had visited by UK general, people in th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as travelers in the corresponding year. Furthermore, It is worth to mention that...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 2, 3, 4 and 8 million respectively.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, whereas, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 1615.20841683 60% => OK
No of words: 199.0 315.596192385 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88442211055 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86172852737 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 176.041082164 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562814070352 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 506.74238477 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.1503532173 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.857142857 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253319919066 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126803264904 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691594583025 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180247585035 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475919659201 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 11.3001002004 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 78.4519038076 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.