The line graph illustrates the number of tourists and local people visited in the UK and overseas respectively, during 1979 to 1999 and the bar chart describes the majority of the UK citizens visited internationally in 5 different countries across the years. Overall, it can depict that the majority of UK residents had the highest significant number in million during travelling in the France. Whereas, In turkey, the lowest number of visitors from the UK had accounted in million.
To begin with, In 1979, the figure of UK citizens stood with 13 million and slightly increased in 1984 up to 20 million. Subsequently, this trend shown dramatically rose up to 55 million across a decade. What is remarkable is the tourists who visited the UK shown gradually risen up to 28 million in 1999, whereas on the other side, mostly UK residents visited in the France up to 12 million, which is the almost half in comparison with overseas travelers in the corresponding year.
Furthermore, It is worth to mention that in 1999, the portion of UK residents had also visited Turkey, Greece, USA and Spain, where Spain got 9 million visitors and the rest of the country got under 5 million travelers from the united kingdom respectively, throughout the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...s had the highest significant number in million during travelling in the France. Wherea...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 475, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...f visitors from the UK had accounted in million. To begin with, In 1979, the figure ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... To begin with, In 1979, the figure of UK citizens stood with 13 million and sl...
^^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as travelers in the corresponding year. Furthermore, It is worth to mention that...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...respectively, throughout the period.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, whereas, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1055.0 1615.20841683 65% => OK
No of words: 211.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87834229 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 176.041082164 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530805687204 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 506.74238477 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.8287856653 49.4020404114 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.714285714 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1428571429 20.7667163134 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248898600014 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122437714126 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670195184886 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178134955824 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452064043746 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 78.4519038076 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.