The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevarit.
Given are two line graphs depicting the wings of possession’s electronic devices for doing household chores and the time spent on it in a particular country nearly a century, starting from 1920.
It is conspicuous that the usage of electronics on purpose to assist in doing housework is increasing in this day and age, which decreased the aggregate figures of hours for this task.
According to the first diagram, the proportion of homemakers utilizing electronic items including washing machine, refrigerator and vacuum cleaner rose from the first years to the last. In 1920, no family used refrigerators. However, the next 80 years witnessed a significant climb with the ownership of 100% of households and this device became the most prevalent one to be utilized. 20 years later, vacuum cleaners became crucial machines used by all family units. By contrast, the percentage of people who used washing machines reached its peak in 1920, at 40%, when compared to two other items.During the period, the proportion fluctuated and many family units were no longer used..
As the information supplied from the second line graph, the amount of time that homemakers spent on doing housework was over 2 days per week in 1920. However, the total time has plunged rapidly to 10 hours a day due to the productivity of electronics.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are two line graphs depicting the wings of ...
^^^
Line 3, column 598, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: During
...t 40%, when compared to two other items.During the period, the proportion fluctuated a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 684, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...nd many family units were no longer used.. As the information supplied from the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1113.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 218.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10550458716 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86085953806 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619266055046 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 506.74238477 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6525036767 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153626882879 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618001877396 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631763373374 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0997872011369 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535486577475 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.