Children usually want to play the same games and watch the same TV programs as their friends. Should parents allow it or not? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience.
The shocking phenomenon of changing desire to watch the similar streaming content or play same sport in children comes to forefront. Some feel that adopting similar habits in sports and in viewing content impact child’s life. However, I agree with those parents who allow their children to watch and play similar things as their acquaintances. In the following paragraphs, I will explore the rationale for both beliefs as well as proffer rationale for my own viewpoint on the matter.
Regarding those who feel that imitating in sports and TV program affect their children capabilities, there exists a valid reason. The main justification is that changing habits is simply too vast to be effective on such a small level. And, they believe that having different habits can help children prosper. The Oregonian reported last week that estimated 100,000 parents reported that their children shared identical habits as their friend, and they all have seditious feelings and always wade in to others’ life. On the top of it they all think in similar fashion, they never think out of the box.
Nevertheless, I cannot hold the opinion in good conscious. The fact is that similar habits make them feel they all hop on the same cruise. The Harvard reported that Austrian children who share same kind of interest in games and in streaming content are more proactive. They help in reducing the demands of some of the artifacts, as they create them by themselves that condense pressure on the manufacturer. The same report proved that sharing same kind of interest helps them foster.
In sum, if everyone puts moratorium on a belief that playing similar sport and watching same content put a kibosh on children’s development. I hope that soon every parent understands the positive change and pitches in; they may create a utopian environment for their children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 425, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... explore the rationale for both beliefs as well as proffer rationale for my own viewpoint ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e. They help in reducing the demands of some of the artifacts, as they create them by thems...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...utopian environment for their children.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12745098039 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73500517758 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552287581699 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6533060412 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210852396415 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720864153203 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061014311144 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134923036803 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295304343138 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.