I do agree with the statement that children brought up in poor families are better prepared to deal with the problems of adult life than children brought up by wealthy parents.
Children of poor parents are prematurely exposed to the problems of adult life, such as learning to survive on a low family income and sacrificing luxuries for essential items. These children begin to see the realities of life in their home or social environment. Their parents’ own struggles service as an example to them.
These children are taught with necessary skills for survival as an adult from an early age. Many children for example work at weekends or holidays to either collect pocket money or even contribute to family income. A good example is the children who accompany their parents to sell product at local market. They make a direct contribution to their family in terms of labour or income.
Children of poor families are also highly motivated. They tend to set high goals to improve their economic and social situations. A relevant example would be Mr. Bill Gates (founder of Microsoft Corporation). He had an impoverished background, but he used his talent and motivations to set up the world’s largest computer organization.
However, there are some problems that children of poor background do encounter. Children who had “robbed” of childhood, for example while working, may feel cheated. They often turn to crime. This is, however, a small group.
In summary, children with an impoverish background are able to deal with the problems of adult life, because of early exposure, family role models and sheer motivations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to service'
Suggestion: to service
...ment. Their parents' own struggles service as an example to them. These childre...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 27, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...all group. In summary, children with an impoverish background are able to deal with the pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, while, for example, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20224719101 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88880364414 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576779026217 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.5353558858 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7058823529 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7058823529 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23529411765 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371620938942 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107854677401 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161449601452 0.0667982634062 242% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229301037366 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.218935773205 0.056905535591 385% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.