With the development of technology, people invented many gadgets in order to provide convenience for our lives. Although the appliances indeed make people’s life easier, many people are getting lazier. In my opinion, I believe that the trend of using the appliances in daily life save much time, but we should avoid using them excessively.
There are so many advantages brought by using the electronic appliance, such as vacuum, rice cooker and so on, especially robotic electronics. Because in modern society, people live in a fast-paced life which makes them no time to regularly do their house works. That is the prime reason for people to perchance these electronic items in order to ease their burdens and reduce their pressure. A statistical report showed that by using gadgets more than 60% people had a fair amount of time focus on their study and work, while nearly 80% people were satisfied with the tasked done by gadgets. In other words, the electronic goods make people’s lives more efficient.
On the other hand, it is undeniable that the excessive use of electric appliances makes people lazier, and even some young people might lose their basic skills of doing house work, such as cooking meals. A good example is some young people who cannot cook rice in camping site only because of the lack of rice cooker. In simpler term, too much relying on the use of gadgets could lead to a difficulty life in wild. Hence, it is better for people to learn some basic skills without using the electronic items.
In conclusion, the high-tech appliance indeed makes our lives much easier, but we need to use it wisely and avoid using it intensively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... wisely and avoid using it intensively.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, while, even so, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93971631206 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54435280585 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560283687943 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7677823983 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.153846154 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296110808266 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106642435102 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444018352435 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178990790072 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485345250612 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.