Children who grow up in families which are short of money are better prepared with the problems of adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents To what extent do you agree or disagree

We must admit that children will be the leader in the future while kids who grew up in middle-class families will be better prepared to deal with the issue in the future than the kids who are born in wealthy families, which was always debatable has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked controversy over the potential impact in recent years. Whereas, In my opinion, I agree with the former proposition to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that poor children have already seen the struggle of their parents and their attitude towards the problem to tackle the situation. Consequently, another pivotal aspect of this trend is that they are more stronger and mentally fit to handle any situation and they are so fearless as they know that they do not have anything to lose like money as compared to wealthy people. For Instance, former Indian cricketer M.S Dhoni was born in a middle-class family, he had to struggle a lot to earn money and now he is one of the wealthiest sports people in India.

Probing ahead, one of the main underlying reasons stems from the fact is that poor children need to work hard to achieve their goals. Whereas rich kids will get everything on the plate without doing any effort. Moving further, it is pertinments to mentioned that rich children are often spoiled because they will get things very easily whereas it is totally opposite for poor children where they need to thrive whole life to earn and Survive. For instance, billionaire football player Christiano Ronaldo grew up in a poor home, he had done hard work for a better future.

To recapitulate, according to the arguments. aforementioned above, I believe that children who grow up in rich households are not able to face challenges in adulthood, unlike these children who grew up with financial limitations.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stronger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stronger
...l aspect of this trend is that they are more stronger and mentally fit to handle any situatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...For Instance, former Indian cricketer M.S Dhoni was born in a middle-class family...
^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ed to work hard to achieve their goals. Whereas rich kids will get everything on the pl...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 46, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Aforementioned
...capitulate, according to the arguments. aforementioned above, I believe that children who grow...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, thus, whereas, while, for instance, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90751445087 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66556104359 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549132947977 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.367470779 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.615384615 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6153846154 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260089022442 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074550862622 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897119756069 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164018341703 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077929820478 0.056905535591 137% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.