Computer translation application have become more and more popular in the recent years. It raise a controversial topic whether computer translator should replace all the language learners. From my perspective, i am partially agree with this opinion.
On the one hand, it is undoubtedly that translation application brings numerous advantages. Computer translation would saving much more time, efforts and money for language learners who struggle and invest a large amount of time to learning language. For example, to learn English, learners need to understanding a wide range of vocabulary along with multiple type of grammars which could cause frustration, and some people invest most of their time and budget in exorbitant courses. Moreover, tourists could be beneficial from such application. In stead of learning languages of every single destinations or using body language, tourist could confidently having conversation with the local and have a wonderful trip without language barriers.
On the other hand, learning language is an essential progress for unceasingly development. Learning language not solely about words and grammar but about the culture themes and the background of it. By learning language, people also comprehend the native people and adopt their culture which could alleviate culture shock and misunderstanding when forming conversation with foreigners. Furthermore, it is proved that learning language enable human brain to develop its cell and capacity of memorizing. Without this learning process, people is overdependent on technology could prevent their brain development and following consequences.
In brief, it is apparent that computer translation facilitate certain aspects of life. Nonetheless, such technology also hinder people from having a deep understand about culture and undermine their brain potential.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'raises'?
Suggestion: raises
...nd more popular in the recent years. It raise a controversial topic whether computer ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...language learners. From my perspective, i am partially agree with this opinion. ...
^
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...rs. From my perspective, i am partially agree with this opinion. On the one hand, it...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'save'
Suggestion: save
... advantages. Computer translation would saving much more time, efforts and money for ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion would saving much more time, efforts and money for language learners who stru...
^^
Line 2, column 547, Rule ID: IN_STEAD_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Instead of'?
Suggestion: Instead of
...ld be beneficial from such application. In stead of learning languages of every single dest...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 615, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es of every single destinations or using body language, tourist could confidently...
^^
Line 2, column 658, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...ody language, tourist could confidently having conversation with the local and have a ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'essential progress'.
Suggestion: essential progress
...On the other hand, learning language is an essential progress for unceasingly development. Learning l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, for example, in brief, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83763837638 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06074714593 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605166051661 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2266413868 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.466666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222276310723 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786238318171 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617174866789 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132086859077 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527544511613 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.