Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Recently, the matter of high-extent similarity between nations and its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, some individuals believe that this phenomenon take place due to buying same goods all four corner of the world. In my view, this is a negative development in terms of cultural effects and handicraft making, although we shouldn’t lose sight of the advocates.
Obviously, through huge changes of worldwide trades, everyone has the ability to purchase same products any spot of the world. In other words, a few giant countries with respect to producing power and a remarkable number of chip workforce such as China and USA can afford to produce many different goods and export them to other countries. Via exporting products, the wealthy nations may penetrate traditions of poor nations and so historical beliefs and cultures of underdeveloped countries will be forgotten. Consequently, their population struggles with making them to be far more similar to rich countries’ people. Likewise, it is likely to happen the same scenario to languages of weak countries and lead to extinction of their language.
In addition, producing same products and spreading them around the globe paves the way to elimination of masterpiece of handicrafts. Throughout historical nations such as Egypt, the importance of hand-made artifacts construction contributes to surviving heritage skills from ancients and positive impacts on living conditions of families who have the ability of making traditional objects.
On the other hand, others are of the opinion that becoming similar to each other in the scale of countries has manifold advantages. Generally speaking, this phenomenon leads to numerous improvements regarding economy and creating a single community. As a tangible example, purchasing same commodities by people around the world eventually make the world’s economy more prosperous. What’s more, under these circumstances diverge cultures ends up to accommodate and constitute a one worldwide society as so-alleged the “global village” with respect to culture rather than communication.
To sum up, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of dissimilarity between nations’ people far outweigh its downsides. Now, can you imagine how boring that more than seven billion people speak a single language and buy same products?
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, some individua...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 283, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... as China and USA can afford to produce many different goods and export them to other countrie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, likewise, may, regarding, so, in addition, such as, in my view, in other words, to sum up, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2075.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59299191375 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06846058117 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630727762803 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5263470582 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.6875 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1875 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281532183622 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806390607296 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623830012122 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136307348519 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440127825576 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, some individua...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 283, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... as China and USA can afford to produce many different goods and export them to other countrie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, likewise, may, regarding, so, in addition, such as, in my view, in other words, to sum up, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2075.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59299191375 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06846058117 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630727762803 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5263470582 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.6875 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1875 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281532183622 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806390607296 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623830012122 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136307348519 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440127825576 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.