What are the positive and negative aspects of the connection to outside world including mobile phone, email and social networking?
Recently, the phenomenon of "the positive and negative aspects of the connection to the outside world including mobile phone, email and social networking" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that social networks might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the outside world can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, the positive aspects of the connection to the outside world can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that mobile phone and public relationships are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of email on human life. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both the environment and interaction with people distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, the negative aspects of the connection to the outside world might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of mental issues. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the virtual world can relate to the reality that the demerits of mobile phones can pertain to the lack of physical activities. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of finding friends were correlated positively with making good relationships, the local authorities would ultimately address the self-esteem of adults. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of a good balance between the outside world and the virtual world.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to support the idea that the merits of the connection to the outside world far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-24 | sattar_iust | 85 | view |
| 2018-11-12 | farrukhshafi | 68 | view |
| 2018-03-28 | preetmaan | 21 | view |
- It is important to preserve both the culture and environment of the places you visit but some people think it is impossible to be a responsible tourist To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- It is important for children to take extra classes or play after school Discuss both and give your opinions 88
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which my be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Today the high sales of popular goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real need of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The lazy journalism has become commonplace in today s digitalized world Explain what is it and the cause of it How do you define lazy journalism and what is the cause 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61333333333 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16090001248 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573333333333 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.5753480737 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.090909091 104.977214359 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436465941102 0.242375264174 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142326491823 0.0925447433944 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133541451183 0.071462118173 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236061668343 0.151781067708 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113786279071 0.0609392437508 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 12.6369458128 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.