Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, thanks to globalization, it is not uncommon to find products from other countries. To my mind, I believe that while this trend brings various benefits for residents, it also can cause potential problems for countries.
To begin with, it is more convenient for citizens’ lives if they can access international goods and service. Customers will have richer choices when they need to buy a product and they do not have to travel overseas for foreign items. For instance, after some well-known Australian milk formula companies entered China’s market, drinking milk from Australia is accessible and affordable. Previously, parents needed to ask someone who was living in Australia to post the product for them, with a much higher price and a long waiting period. Therefore, the accessibility to foreign products makes it easier for customers who like international brands.
To consider another side, it is negative for local businesses and the economy if countries turn to extremely similar. Firstly, with the success of the international franchises, local businesses are disappearing. Take the food industry as an example. The most important reason is that increasing people, especially the younger generations, would like to eat oversea food brands, such as KFC, McDonald’s and Domino’s, rather than domestic cuisines. Many restaurants went bankrupt due to the harsh competition from the bigger companies. Moreover, the similarity may also post a detrimental impact on tourism because the unique features have been assimilating. Travellers would not like to visit a country where everything is the same as their own countries. Thus, it is terrible for countries small business and tourism.
In conclusion, globalization is both a friend and a foe for countries. When people enjoy the convivence and the comfortable life it brings with them, they should not forget the harms.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 551, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce and a long waiting period. Therefore, the accessibility to foreign products ma...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as for, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44745762712 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03024303998 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640677966102 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0260359158 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5294117647 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3529411765 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114237098824 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332422275857 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311897353838 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0561637904572 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250553924378 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.