People still value artists in the age of advanced science and technology. Why do you think this is? Are arts as important as science and technology?
It has been argued that arts still have a place in the era of science and technology. In this essay, I will list two main reasons why artists are valued in society and explain why I think scientists are more significant for human beings.
To begin with, there are two obvious reasons why people respect artists even though science and technology play an important role in the development of society. First of all, it is undeniable that artists can create beauty through their art crafts. For instance, the unique street arts, such as graffiti and sculptures, can put colours on the city where residents and visitors appreciate and enjoy the fascinating scenery. Secondly, arts are the most common way for people to kill the time and enrich their spiritual world. To be more specific, it is not uncommon that people escape from the reality and immerse themselves in music. Thus, artists remain their vital statues because of the appreciation and entertainment value they create.
Nevertheless, although arts are indispensable for our society, I believe we need to pay more attention to the development of science and technology. Arts, whether it is painting, music or a poem, need to be preserved because they tell stories and trigger human’s feelings and emotions. However, humans are encountering urgent problems which need to be solved by high technology and advanced science rather than the angelical melody. For example, immediate actions and novel strategies have been taken to protect Earth due to the detrimental environmental issues. The priority should be put on training and educating the young generation to be scientists.
In conclusion, artists make beauty that can make lives colourful. People need to appreciate it while should work hard in scientific fields to solve the serious problems we are facing. Only with the development of science and technology, can human beings survive in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18971061093 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77476498584 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59807073955 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5552138554 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.875 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1875 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271609017227 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769305186859 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073877849349 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160883357616 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709645765124 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.