Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Is it a positive or negative development

Countries are becoming similar to each other since people are capable to purchase similar products. In my opinion, this is a positive development.

Ability to buy same kind of products anywhere the world is helping people in easy migration from one place to other places. People can travel to other countries in search of jobs which they are interested in. Although people can move to other countries for their work despite not having same food products in other countries, food is a major concern for majority of people if similar food products are not available in those countries where they wish to move. If same products are available in most of the countries, then people can easily adapt themselves in any new country.

Availability of similar products in majority of the countries fosters a sense of cooperation among the countries. Any country can easily import the products from other countries when there is a famine or shortage in their country. The charge of the imported products will also be low since their supply is more than the demand. So, these products with become affordable. Any country can import their products to other countries increasing the income of people in that country. This way all countries cooperate themselves in developing their countries.

People need not worry about the availability of products in their country. For instance, if there is any tsunami in any country, then there will be a huge shortage of the daily products. But people can stay stress free during this situation as they can easily import those products from the nearby countries.

In conclusion, ability to buy similar products from any country in the world is a positive development as it has many advantages such as reducing stress about the enough availability of products, smooth migration and in developing cooperation among all the countries.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14052287582 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68014702769 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437908496732 0.561755894193 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4666069635 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3125 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320901864875 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116719982657 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058327559055 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190821685795 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591138863224 0.056905535591 104% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.